Sample report
What you actually receive.
Below is a complete audit summary for an illustrative company. Meridian Partners does not exist. The company, the figures, and the findings are constructed to demonstrate the format, the evidence standard, and the level of specificity in a real report.
Clearly labelled as illustrative. No client work is published on this site without written permission and verified figures.
Executive summary
Meridian Partners is a twelve-person management consultancy serving mid-market manufacturers. Average engagement value is stated at $85,000. The website does not reflect a firm at that price point. It scores 61 of 100, in the Underselling band.
The firm is not losing work on capability. It is losing work in the interval between a referral being made and the first call being booked, an interval that is entirely governed by the website. Three dimensions carry the loss: positioning clarity, credibility and proof, and search visibility. Design and technical hygiene are strong, which is the useful finding here. The firm has already spent money on the parts that were not the problem.
Priority findings
01. The homepage sells the firm, not the buyer. Positioning clarity, 4 of 10.
Evidence. The homepage headline reads "Strategic excellence since 2011." The first three paragraphs describe the firm's history, values, and team size. The word "manufacturer" does not appear until the fourth section. Nowhere on the page is the buyer's problem stated.
Commercial risk. A referred prospect arrives already knowing the firm is competent. They are checking whether the firm is competent at their specific problem. The page does not answer that question, so the burden moves to a call that many will not book.
Correction. Replace the headline with the buyer and the outcome. Move the manufacturing focus above the fold. Cut the history section entirely or relocate it to the about page. Effort, one day of writing. This is the highest-return correction available.
02. Four capability claims, zero supporting evidence. Credibility and proof, 3 of 10.
Evidence. The site claims deep operational expertise, proven results, trusted partnerships, and measurable impact. There is no case study, no named client, no figure, and no dated engagement anywhere on the site. The only verifiable fact is the founding year.
Commercial risk. Buyers at $85,000 compare three to five firms. Where two are otherwise equal, the one with a documented result wins on the first pass. Meridian cannot compete on that pass, so it competes later, on price.
Correction. Publish two case studies in situation, action, result format, each carrying one number the client will approve. Place a one-sentence result statement above the fold. Effort, one week including client approvals.
03. Search cannot connect the firm to its expertise. Search visibility, 3 of 10.
Evidence. Page titles are Home, About, Services, and Contact. There is no page targeting any manufacturing-specific consulting phrase. Meta descriptions are auto-generated. The firm ranks on the first page for its own name and nothing else.
Commercial risk. Every buyer who searches the problem instead of the firm finds a competitor. This compounds monthly and is invisible in analytics because the traffic never arrives.
Correction. Rewrite titles and descriptions against six commercial phrases. Build three service pages targeting the specific problems the firm is hired for. Effort, two weeks.
Five immediate improvements
Rewrite the homepage headline to name the buyer and the outcome. Add a single verifiable result sentence above the fold. Replace "Contact Us" with a defined next step and a stated response time. Rewrite the four page titles against the phrases buyers search. Move the two strongest team credentials from the about page onto the homepage.
Implementation roadmap
Week 1. Homepage headline, above-fold result statement, and call-to-action rewrite. Weeks 2 to 3. Two case studies produced and published, with client approval secured in parallel. Weeks 4 to 5. Search corrections and three new service pages. Week 6. Conversion tracking installed and a measurement baseline established before any further change.
Meridian Partners is a constructed example. Any resemblance to an actual firm is coincidental.
The self-audit
This site, scored under its own method.
A firm that sells clarity should be willing to be measured by it. Canvas Audit scores 84 against its own standard, in the Sound with gaps band. Here is what it loses points on and why.
Credibility and proof, 6 of 10
The largest gap on this site. Canvas Audit launched recently and publishes no client testimonials or named results, because none have been verified and approved yet. The method, the sample report, and this self-audit are offered in their place. This score rises when real results exist, not before.
Search visibility, 7 of 10
The domain is new and has no authority. Metadata and structure are correct, but ranking for competitive commercial phrases takes months of published work that does not yet exist here.
Conversion path, 9 of 10
Free to paid is clear and measurable. The gap is the follow-up sequence, which is being built rather than assumed.
Positioning clarity, 9 of 10
The buyer and the problem are named above the fold. The point lost is category education. Executive website audit is not yet a phrase most buyers search for.
Next step
See where your own site lands.
Run the Signal Check for a preliminary band in two minutes, or request your verified score free.